Verulam (readers' letters - September 2017)

Author:Various

Date published

1 September 2017

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Back to Previous

Verulam (readers' letters - September 2017)

The Structural Engineer
Author

Various

Date published

1 September 2017

Author

Various

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

This month's letters scrutinise the President's views on site supervision, raise some interesting questions in the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower fire, discuss the benefits and drawbacks of BIM, as well as commenting on concrete design to the Eurocodes and British Standards, fracking and various other topics.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
5
Publisher:
万博体育手机客户端登录

Tags

Opinion Issue 9

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Viewpoint: To BIM or not to be?</h4>

Viewpoint: To BIM or not to be?

Balazs Trojak challenges BIM refuseniks to dip their toe in the water and explore its benefits, or risk irrelevance in an increasingly digital future.

Date ‐1 September 2017
Author ‐B. Trojak (Paraforms)
Price ‐£9
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Viewpoint: Since when did we need different factors for dead and live loads?</h4>

Viewpoint: Since when did we need different factors for dead and live loads?

Alastair Hughes makes a case for revision of the Eurocodes to harmonise the load factors for permanent and variable actions, or dead and live loads.

Date ‐1 September 2017
Author ‐A. Hughes
Price ‐£9
The Structural Engineer
<h4>And finally... (September 2017)</h4>

And finally... (September 2017)

This month, Hugh Morrison MIStructE poses a question on bending and deflection for a steel floor beam.

Date ‐1 September 2017
Author ‐H. Morrison
Price ‐£9

Item Added to basket

Go to checkout
Baidu